The understated role of virtual cards in modern travel payments

Digital payments are complex. Few industries demonstrate this more clearly than travel.

A typical ecommerce transaction is relatively linear: a business enables a customer to pay, supported by a payment partner operating largely behind the scenes. Travel, by contrast, depends on an interconnected ecosystem. Airlines, hotels, intermediaries, marketplaces, loyalty programmes, and local suppliers all contribute to a single journey - often across borders, currencies, and timeframes.

This ecosystem introduces multiple technical touchpoints into every transaction. While collaboration is essential, each additional party increases operational complexity and risk. Funds often move long before services are delivered, liability is unevenly distributed, and visibility across the payment lifecycle can be fragmented.

Virtual cards have become an important mechanism for travel businesses to manage supplier payments and improve oversight of complex fund flows. They are typically viewed as a practical tool, yet that framing can miss the core point.

Virtual cards are only as effective as the payment infrastructure behind them. They deliver value when acceptance works reliably across fragmented suppliers and markets, supported by strong acquiring coverage, intelligent cross-border routing, and predictable settlement.

Operational benefits with commercial upside

Virtual cards are often used for operational optimisation, and that framing is justified. They improve cash flow predictability, simplify reconciliation, and help contain risk by isolating exposure at supplier or booking level. So, a single supplier failure is less likely to cascade across other parties.

But virtual cards do not succeed on issuance alone. They only deliver consistent outcomes when acceptance is dependable across thousands of suppliers with different acquirers, payment setups, and regional constraints. When acceptance underperforms, the model becomes exception-driven, requiring manual interventions that erode efficiency and predictability.

This is where infrastructure matters. Travel brands need payments capabilities that support acceptance and settlement at scale: local acquiring where it improves approval performance, smart cross-border routing, and the operational ability to settle predictably across markets.

When acceptance is handled well, virtual cards also remove friction from revenue-sensitive parts of the travel payment flow. By enabling card-based supplier payouts across borders, travel businesses can transact with a broader supplier base without inheriting the operational burden typically associated with international payouts. Local bank details, cut-off times, and country-specific payout processes become less of a constraint, accelerating supplier onboarding and inventory expansion in long-tail or high-growth markets.

There is also a subtler commercial effect. Virtual cards allow travel brands to align inbound customer payments more closely with outbound supplier settlement, reducing the need to pre-fund uncertainty and improving liquidity management. In a sector shaped by seasonality and disruption, this control supports more confident scaling without adding complexity.

Are virtual cards still misunderstood?

One misconception is that virtual cards are too expensive to justify at scale.

Historically, this perception was not unfounded. Early programmes came with higher fees, limited flexibility, and economics that were difficult to compare against traditional payout methods, so they were sometimes dismissed as niche and costly.

That assumption is increasingly outdated. The travel industry has matured, issuance models have evolved, acceptance has improved, and pricing is more competitive than many businesses assume.

More importantly, smart players do not evaluate virtual cards purely as a line-item cost. They treat them as a commercial instrument that can be leveraged on both sides of the transaction.

As issuers, they capture value through cash flow improvements, reduced operational friction, and risk containment. As acceptors, they can use virtual card acceptance as a negotiation lever with agents, platforms, and partners that prefer this settlement method, thus shaping supplier terms, settlement timing, and partner economics. In practice, value flows through the ecosystem rather than sitting with a single party, while the broader process becomes more predictable and less exposed to operational failure.

The better question is not whether virtual cards have a cost, but whether travel businesses measure that cost in isolation; without accounting for the value created when virtual cards are supported by reliable acceptance and settlement capabilities. This is why dependable payments infrastructure at scale matters.

Looking ahead: incremental progress, stronger infrastructure

Virtual cards are sometimes misunderstood because their benefits are not always immediately visible. They do not radically change the travel experience overnight, nor are they designed to. What they have done is deliver significant incremental improvements across supplier payouts, operational control, and risk management. Those gains should continue as acceptance deepens across hospitality and programmes shift from ad hoc usage to standardised supplier settlement.

The next frontier is less about the card itself and more about what it enables: a controllable, rules-based payment instrument embedded into models that reduce complexity at the edges of the ecosystem. This is particularly relevant in hospitality, where the long tail of independent properties creates enormous diversity at the property level and a disproportionate share of processing friction.

One emerging approach is centralising payment responsibility to simplify that long tail. Rather than requiring each property to manage payment processing independently, some travel brands and intermediaries are exploring merchant of record-style models where suppliers are onboarded as sub-merchants, acceptance is aggregated centrally, and settlement is managed end to end. This shifts payments complexity away from individual properties and into the platform layer, where it can be managed consistently and at scale.

The future for virtual cards will be bright, but only where the supporting payments infrastructure is strong enough to make them work reliably across fragmented suppliers and markets. Issuing is only part of the equation. Value is realised when acceptance performs, cross-border routing is optimised, and settlement is predictable.

That is why partnerships that connect virtual card issuance with global acquiring and payments infrastructure matter. Combining WEX’s issuing capabilities with Nuvei’s ability to support acceptance and settlement at scale helps travel brands turn virtual cards into a dependable, repeatable operating model, rather than a solution that works in theory but breaks down in the long tail.

Damien Cramer is Senior Vice President of Global Travel at Nuvei

‍